Hajar Crinebouch vs Lea Tholey Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Sep at 02:53 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Crinebouch vs L. Tholey

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Crinebouch 1 - 0 Tholey
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hajar Crinebouch winning 2 and Lea Tholey winning 0. The last match between Hajar Crinebouch and Lea Tholey was at the W15 Nogent-sur-Marne, 15-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Hajar Crinebouch getting the victory 6-4 3-1 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Crinebouch | 1 |
| Tholey | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Nogent-sur-Marne(09-15-25)
H. Crinebouch vs L. Tholey H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 34.78% (8-15) | Career Total W/L | 56.64% (192-147) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Crinebouch vs L. Tholey Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Tholey has been winning 37.17% of points on their second serve, while Crinebouch has managed 28.37%. How crucial is this difference? Statistically, it's a significant indicator of match outcomes.
- Return Games: Tholey has won 44.51% of their opponent’s second serve points in recent matches. On the other hand, Crinebouch fares slightly better at 48.76%. When it comes to first serve returns, Crinebouch holds an edge with 37.79% compared to Tholey's 30.28%.
- Pressure Situations: When examining break points saved, Tholey has a higher save rate at 36.21% over the past six months, while Crinebouch has saved 29.55%. This could be pivotal in crucial match moments.
- Match Winning Percentage: Tholey displays a strong record, winning 84.62% of their matches in the past year, whereas Crinebouch has won 46.15% of their matches. Does this skew the potential outcome? Likely.
- Surface Performance: Tholey excels on hard courts with a career win percentage of 67%, while Crinebouch struggles on this surface, having never won (0%). Crinebouch performs best on clay with a win rate of 44%.
- Player Level: In the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments over the last year, Tholey has won almost all matches, with a 90.91% win rate, while Crinebouch has won 55.56% of their matches. This disparity highlights differing recent form levels in competitive play.
- Opponent Quality: Tholey has faced lower-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 313.62, while Crinebouch has tackled a stronger field with an average rank of 161.38. Does this experience against tougher competition give Crinebouch a hidden edge?
- Deciding Sets: In matches that reach a deciding set, Tholey has been victorious 67% of the time, slightly ahead of Crinebouch's 60%. Will this slight edge matter if the match is pushed to the limit?
- Break Point Conversion: Though Tholey converts 40% of break opportunities, Crinebouch outperforms with a 55.17% conversion rate. This could be significant in tipping the scales during rallies.
Editorial Prediction (September 15, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Tholey and Crinebouch promises to be intriguing, with both players having strengths and weaknesses. Tholey displays dominance in second serve points and match wins, suggesting reliability in match outcomes.
However, Crinebouch's ability to return serves effectively and convert break points signifies potential to disrupt Tholey’s rhythm. The tougher opponents Crinebouch has faced may enhance their preparedness for high-pressure situations.
Given the matchup on a hard surface, where Tholey is notably stronger, coupled with an impressive match-winning record, Tholey is predicted to have the advantage in this encounter. Despite Crinebouch’s efforts and strengths in certain areas, Tholey's overall form and surface suitability make them the likely winner of this match.
Hajar Crinebouch vs Lea Tholey Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Crinebouch vs L. Tholey H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 9 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:14:23 | Average Match Time | 1:14:23 |
| 54% (27/50) | 1st Serve % | 57% (29/51) |
| 63% (17/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 52% (12/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 55% (28/51) | Return Points Win % | 42% (21/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Crinebouch Recent Matches Played
L. Tholey Recent Matches Played

H. Crinebouch vs L. Tholey Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.78% (8/15) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.64% (192/147) |
| 38.89% (21/33) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.28% (419/339) |
| 44.97% (237/290) | Games Win/Loss | 52.82% (3600/3216) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 67.02% (63/31) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.67% (113/90) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.10% (16/26) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 12 | Aces Total | 214 |
| 0.4 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 103 | Total Double Faults | 749 |
| 1:5:46 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 234.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.14 |
| 57% (655/1156) | 1st Serve % | 57% (6192/10833) |
| 58% (377/655) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (3823/6192) |
| 40% (200/501) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2126/4641) |
| 51% (65/128) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (670/1339) |
| 45% (483/1070) | Return Points Win % | 46% (4904/10617) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 16.67% (1/5) | Challenger W/L | 35.71% (30/54) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Futures W/L | 63.78% (162/92) |
| 35% (8/23) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (190/335) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 33% (2/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (32/57) |
| 38% (3/8) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (46/83) |
| 73% (11/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (179/167) |
| 27% (11/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (179/12) |
| 0% (12/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (160/25) |